BBJP vs DXJ: Which ETF Is Better in 2026?
A metric-by-metric comparison of JPMorgan BetaBuilders Japan ETF (BBJP) and WisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund (DXJ) — both Single Country - Developed funds — using ETFValuer's daily-updated rankings.
Educational content — not financial advice. Data as of July 25, 2026. ~5 minute read.
The Verdict
BBJP and DXJ compete directly — both are Single Country - Developed funds chasing the same job in a portfolio. That makes this a genuine either/or: the index each tracks, what it costs, and how it has handled drawdowns are what separate them, not the broad exposure they give you.
On ETFValuer's overall model — which blends return, risk-adjusted performance, cost, drawdown, size and volatility — DXJ scores higher: 76.4 (Grade B+) versus 70.7 for BBJP. That doesn't make BBJP a bad fund; it means DXJ currently edges it out on this specific mix of factors. Read the metric-by-metric breakdown below before deciding which matters more for your own portfolio.
Head-to-Head: Every Metric
| BBJP | DXJ | |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Single Country - Developed | Single Country - Developed |
| Expense ratio | 0.19% | 0.48% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $17.6B | $7.1B |
| Dividend yield | 4.69% | 0.97% |
| 1-year return | +23.08% | +48.57% |
| 3-year return | +56.03% | +123.63% |
| Volatility | 20.22% | 18.01% |
| Max drawdown | -14.49% | -22.19% |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.89 | 2.42 |
| ETFValuer score | 70.7 | 76.4 |
| Grade | B | B+ |
| Overall rank | #105 | #33 |
Bold marks the better value in each row. "Better" is directional only (e.g. lower cost, higher return) — it isn't a recommendation by itself. See the full methodology.
Cost
BBJP is the cheaper fund, charging 0.19% a year versus 0.48% for DXJ — a gap of 0.29 percentage points (about $29.00/year on a $10,000 position) that compounds meaningfully over a multi-decade holding period. See the ETF Fee Calculator for the exact dollar impact at your investment size and horizon.
What DXJ's Fees Cost You
DXJ charges an expense ratio of 0.48% a year, deducted automatically from the fund's value. Small percentages compound into real money — adjust the figures below to see the impact on your own numbers.
Assumes a constant gross return and no additional contributions — a simplification, but it isolates exactly what the expense ratio costs. Try the full fee calculator to model contributions and compare any two funds.
Performance & Risk
Over the trailing 3 years, DXJ returned +123.63% versus +56.03% for BBJP — a gap of about 67.6 percentage points. On risk, BBJP has held up better historically, with a shallower max drawdown (-14.49% vs. -22.19%). DXJ currently has the better risk-adjusted return (Sharpe ratio of 2.42 vs. 0.89), meaning it delivered more return per unit of volatility taken on.
How Closely Do They Track Each Other?
Over the last 3.0 years of daily returns (752 shared trading days), BBJP and DXJ show a strong correlation of 0.851 — clearly related, with room to diverge. There is some genuine differentiation here, but not enough to call these complementary holdings. Pairing them mostly concentrates risk rather than spreading it.
| Measure | Value | What it means |
|---|---|---|
| Daily return correlation | 0.851 | Strong — clearly related, with room to diverge |
| R-squared | 72.5% | 72.5% of BBJP's daily moves are explained by DXJ's |
| Tracking error (annualised) | 10.85% | Typical yearly spread between the two funds' returns |
| Annualised return over 3.0y | BBJP +16.59% · DXJ +32.20% | DXJ ahead by 15.61 points a year |
Correlation alone understates how far these can drift. Across every rolling 12-month window in the period, BBJP finished as much as +7.4 points ahead of DXJ at the best extreme and -28.1 points at the worst — a 35.5-point spread between the best and worst year of relative performance. Two funds can correlate tightly day to day and still deliver very different outcomes over any single year you happen to hold them.
Calculated from daily total returns over the trailing 3-year window, recomputed every day this site refreshes. Correlation of 1.00 means the two funds moved in lockstep; 0.00 means their daily moves were unrelated.
Holdings Overlap
BBJP and DXJ hold 5 of the same companies among their top 10 positions. Those shared names make up 15.1% of BBJP and 17.7% of DXJ. That's meaningful duplication. The funds aren't interchangeable, but a good share of your money would be riding on the same companies twice.
| Shared Holding | BBJP Weight | DXJ Weight |
|---|---|---|
| Toyota Motor Corp. | 4.24% | 4.56% |
| Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc. | 3.91% | 4.71% |
| Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group, Inc. | 2.60% | 3.06% |
| Mitsubishi Corp. | 2.27% | 3.06% |
| Mizuho Financial Group, Inc. | 2.04% | 2.31% |
Compares the top 10 reported holdings from each fund's most recent SEC N-PORT-P filing, so it understates total overlap — funds tracking similar indexes overlap far more deeply than the top 10 alone can show. Search any company across all tracked funds with the Stock Overlap tool.
Which One Should You Pick?
Lean BBJP if…
- You want the lower running cost — 0.19% vs 0.48%, about $29 a year less on a $10,000 position
- Current income matters to you — it yields 4.69% against 0.97%
Lean DXJ if…
- It has been the calmer ride (18.0% volatility vs 20.2%)
- You care about return per unit of risk — its Sharpe ratio of 2.42 beats 0.89
- You weight recent results heavily — it returned 123.6% over 3 years against 56.0%
Whichever you pick, holding both at full weight is usually the wrong answer — see the overlap and correlation sections above.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is BBJP or DXJ better?
On ETFValuer's overall model — which blends return, risk-adjusted performance, cost, drawdown, size and volatility — DXJ scores higher: 76.4 (Grade B+) versus 70.7 for BBJP. That doesn't make BBJP a bad fund; it means DXJ currently edges it out on this specific mix of factors. Read the metric-by-metric breakdown below before deciding which matters more for your own portfolio.
Which has the lower expense ratio, BBJP or DXJ?
BBJP currently has the lower expense ratio (0.19% vs. 0.48%).
Can I hold both BBJP and DXJ?
You can, though the benefit is limited. At a correlation of 0.85, BBJP and DXJ fall together far more often than not, so owning both adds complexity and a second expense ratio without much real diversification. Most investors are better served picking one.
Go deeper on either fund
Full daily-updated metrics, holdings context, and category peers.