FNDE vs IEMG: Which ETF Is Better in 2026?
A metric-by-metric comparison of Schwab Fundamental Emerging Markets Equity ETF (FNDE) and iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (IEMG) — both Emerging Markets funds — using ETFValuer's daily-updated rankings.
Educational content — not financial advice. Data as of August 09, 2026. ~5 minute read.
The Verdict
FNDE and IEMG compete directly — both are Emerging Markets funds chasing the same job in a portfolio. That makes this a genuine either/or: the index each tracks, what it costs, and how it has handled drawdowns are what separate them, not the broad exposure they give you.
On ETFValuer's overall model — which blends return, risk-adjusted performance, cost, drawdown, size and volatility — IEMG scores higher: 74.6 (Grade B) versus 69.9 for FNDE. That doesn't make FNDE a bad fund; it means IEMG currently edges it out on this specific mix of factors. Read the metric-by-metric breakdown below before deciding which matters more for your own portfolio.
Head-to-Head: Every Metric
| FNDE | IEMG | |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Emerging Markets | Emerging Markets |
| Expense ratio | 0.39% | 0.09% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $9.7B | $152.2B |
| Dividend yield | 3.61% | 1.46% |
| 1-year return | +28.55% | +34.48% |
| 3-year return | +78.72% | +77.84% |
| Volatility | 16.13% | 23.85% |
| Max drawdown | -18.40% | -17.21% |
| Sharpe ratio | 1.46 | 1.24 |
| ETFValuer score | 69.9 | 74.6 |
| Grade | B | B |
| Overall rank | #108 | #50 |
Bold marks the better value in each row. "Better" is directional only (e.g. lower cost, higher return) — it isn't a recommendation by itself. See the full methodology.
Cost
IEMG is the cheaper fund, charging 0.09% a year versus 0.39% for FNDE — a gap of 0.30 percentage points (about $30.00/year on a $10,000 position) that compounds meaningfully over a multi-decade holding period. See the ETF Fee Calculator for the exact dollar impact at your investment size and horizon.
What FNDE's Fees Cost You
FNDE charges an expense ratio of 0.39% a year, deducted automatically from the fund's value. Small percentages compound into real money — adjust the figures below to see the impact on your own numbers.
Assumes a constant gross return and no additional contributions — a simplification, but it isolates exactly what the expense ratio costs. Try the full fee calculator to model contributions and compare any two funds.
Performance & Risk
Over the trailing 3 years, FNDE returned +78.72% versus +77.84% for IEMG — a gap of about 0.9 percentage points. On risk, IEMG has held up better historically, with a shallower max drawdown (-17.21% vs. -18.40%). FNDE currently has the better risk-adjusted return (Sharpe ratio of 1.46 vs. 1.24), meaning it delivered more return per unit of volatility taken on.
How Closely Do They Track Each Other?
Over the last 3.0 years of daily returns (752 shared trading days), FNDE and IEMG show a high correlation of 0.914 — closely related, but not identical. Holding both would add very little diversification: when one falls, the other almost always falls with it. Treat these as alternatives to each other, not as complements in the same portfolio.
| Measure | Value | What it means |
|---|---|---|
| Daily return correlation | 0.914 | High — closely related, but not identical |
| R-squared | 83.6% | 83.6% of FNDE's daily moves are explained by IEMG's |
| Tracking error (annualised) | 7.79% | Typical yearly spread between the two funds' returns |
| Annualised return over 3.0y | FNDE +20.74% · IEMG +20.64% | FNDE ahead by 0.10 points a year |
Correlation alone understates how far these can drift. Across every rolling 12-month window in the period, FNDE finished as much as +9.3 points ahead of IEMG at the best extreme and -20.7 points at the worst — a 30.0-point spread between the best and worst year of relative performance. Two funds can correlate tightly day to day and still deliver very different outcomes over any single year you happen to hold them.
Calculated from daily total returns over the trailing 3-year window, recomputed every day this site refreshes. Correlation of 1.00 means the two funds moved in lockstep; 0.00 means their daily moves were unrelated.
Holdings Overlap
FNDE and IEMG hold 5 of the same companies among their top 10 positions. Those shared names make up 15.8% of FNDE and 18.9% of IEMG. That's meaningful duplication. The funds aren't interchangeable, but a good share of your money would be riding on the same companies twice.
| Shared Holding | FNDE Weight | IEMG Weight |
|---|---|---|
| Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Ltd | 6.48% | 12.49% |
| Alibaba Group Holding Ltd | 2.72% | 1.82% |
| Hon Hai Precision Industry Co Ltd | 3.31% | 0.79% |
| Tencent Holdings Ltd | 1.51% | 2.37% |
| MediaTek Inc | 1.80% | 1.42% |
Compares the top 10 reported holdings from each fund's most recent SEC N-PORT-P filing, so it understates total overlap — funds tracking similar indexes overlap far more deeply than the top 10 alone can show. Search any company across all tracked funds with the Stock Overlap tool.
Which One Should You Pick?
Lean FNDE if…
- Current income matters to you — it yields 3.61% against 1.46%
- It has been the calmer ride (16.1% volatility vs 23.9%)
- You care about return per unit of risk — its Sharpe ratio of 1.46 beats 1.24
Lean IEMG if…
- You want the lower running cost — 0.09% vs 0.39%, about $30 a year less on a $10,000 position
- You want the deeper, more liquid market ($152B in assets vs $10B)
Whichever you pick, holding both at full weight is usually the wrong answer — see the overlap and correlation sections above.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is FNDE or IEMG better?
On ETFValuer's overall model — which blends return, risk-adjusted performance, cost, drawdown, size and volatility — IEMG scores higher: 74.6 (Grade B) versus 69.9 for FNDE. That doesn't make FNDE a bad fund; it means IEMG currently edges it out on this specific mix of factors. Read the metric-by-metric breakdown below before deciding which matters more for your own portfolio.
Which has the lower expense ratio, FNDE or IEMG?
IEMG currently has the lower expense ratio (0.09% vs. 0.39%).
Can I hold both FNDE and IEMG?
You can, though the benefit is limited. At a correlation of 0.91, FNDE and IEMG fall together far more often than not, so owning both adds complexity and a second expense ratio without much real diversification. Most investors are better served picking one.
Go deeper on either fund
Full daily-updated metrics, holdings context, and category peers.