IEMG vs SCHE: Which ETF Is Better in 2026?
A metric-by-metric comparison of iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (IEMG) and Schwab Emerging Markets Equity ETF (SCHE) — both Emerging Markets funds — using ETFValuer's daily-updated rankings.
Educational content — not financial advice. Data as of July 25, 2026. ~5 minute read.
The Verdict
IEMG and SCHE compete directly — both are Emerging Markets funds chasing the same job in a portfolio. That makes this a genuine either/or: the index each tracks, what it costs, and how it has handled drawdowns are what separate them, not the broad exposure they give you.
On ETFValuer's overall model — which blends return, risk-adjusted performance, cost, drawdown, size and volatility — IEMG scores higher: 75.4 (Grade B+) versus 62.9 for SCHE. That doesn't make SCHE a bad fund; it means IEMG currently edges it out on this specific mix of factors. Read the metric-by-metric breakdown below before deciding which matters more for your own portfolio.
Head-to-Head: Every Metric
| IEMG | SCHE | |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Emerging Markets | Emerging Markets |
| Expense ratio | 0.09% | 0.06% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $160.7B | $12.5B |
| Dividend yield | 1.48% | 2.66% |
| 1-year return | +27.39% | +16.31% |
| 3-year return | +61.07% | +48.76% |
| Volatility | 23.23% | 17.78% |
| Max drawdown | -17.21% | -17.07% |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.96 | 0.64 |
| ETFValuer score | 75.4 | 62.9 |
| Grade | B+ | C |
| Overall rank | #49 | #197 |
Bold marks the better value in each row. "Better" is directional only (e.g. lower cost, higher return) — it isn't a recommendation by itself. See the full methodology.
Cost
SCHE is the cheaper fund, charging 0.06% a year versus 0.09% for IEMG — a gap of 0.03 percentage points (about $3.00/year on a $10,000 position) that compounds meaningfully over a multi-decade holding period. See the ETF Fee Calculator for the exact dollar impact at your investment size and horizon.
What IEMG's Fees Cost You
IEMG charges an expense ratio of 0.09% a year, deducted automatically from the fund's value. Small percentages compound into real money — adjust the figures below to see the impact on your own numbers.
Assumes a constant gross return and no additional contributions — a simplification, but it isolates exactly what the expense ratio costs. Try the full fee calculator to model contributions and compare any two funds.
Performance & Risk
Over the trailing 3 years, IEMG returned +61.07% versus +48.76% for SCHE — a gap of about 12.3 percentage points. On risk, SCHE has held up better historically, with a shallower max drawdown (-17.07% vs. -17.21%). IEMG currently has the better risk-adjusted return (Sharpe ratio of 0.96 vs. 0.64), meaning it delivered more return per unit of volatility taken on.
How Closely Do They Track Each Other?
Over the last 3.0 years of daily returns (752 shared trading days), IEMG and SCHE show a high correlation of 0.965 — closely related, but not identical. Holding both would add very little diversification: when one falls, the other almost always falls with it. Treat these as alternatives to each other, not as complements in the same portfolio.
| Measure | Value | What it means |
|---|---|---|
| Daily return correlation | 0.965 | High — closely related, but not identical |
| R-squared | 93.1% | 93.1% of IEMG's daily moves are explained by SCHE's |
| Tracking error (annualised) | 5.21% | Typical yearly spread between the two funds' returns |
| Annualised return over 3.0y | IEMG +17.99% · SCHE +15.02% | IEMG ahead by 2.97 points a year |
Correlation alone understates how far these can drift. Across every rolling 12-month window in the period, IEMG finished as much as +22.7 points ahead of SCHE at the best extreme and -5.0 points at the worst — a 27.7-point spread between the best and worst year of relative performance. Two funds can correlate tightly day to day and still deliver very different outcomes over any single year you happen to hold them.
Calculated from daily total returns over the trailing 3-year window, recomputed every day this site refreshes. Correlation of 1.00 means the two funds moved in lockstep; 0.00 means their daily moves were unrelated.
Holdings Overlap
IEMG and SCHE hold 7 of the same companies among their top 10 positions. Those shared names make up 19.8% of IEMG and 26.4% of SCHE. That's heavy duplication — owning both largely doubles down on the same companies rather than spreading risk. Most investors should pick one.
| Shared Holding | IEMG Weight | SCHE Weight |
|---|---|---|
| Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd. | 11.41% | 17.06% |
| Tencent Holdings Limited | 3.14% | 3.15% |
| Alibaba Group Holding Limited | 2.32% | 2.57% |
| HON HAI PRECISION INDUSTRY CO., LTD. | 0.72% | 1.04% |
| HDFC BANK LIMITED | 0.82% | 0.83% |
| CHINA CONSTRUCTION BANK CORPORATION | 0.73% | 0.88% |
| RELIANCE INDUSTRIES LIMITED | 0.70% | 0.88% |
Compares the top 10 reported holdings from each fund's most recent SEC N-PORT-P filing, so it understates total overlap — funds tracking similar indexes overlap far more deeply than the top 10 alone can show. Search any company across all tracked funds with the Stock Overlap tool.
Which One Should You Pick?
Lean IEMG if…
- You care about return per unit of risk — its Sharpe ratio of 0.96 beats 0.64
- You weight recent results heavily — it returned 61.1% over 3 years against 48.8%
- You want the deeper, more liquid market ($161B in assets vs $12B)
Lean SCHE if…
- You want the lower running cost — 0.06% vs 0.09%, about $3 a year less on a $10,000 position
- Current income matters to you — it yields 2.66% against 1.48%
- It has been the calmer ride (17.8% volatility vs 23.2%) with a shallower worst-case fall (-17.1% vs -17.2%)
Whichever you pick, holding both at full weight is usually the wrong answer — see the overlap and correlation sections above.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is IEMG or SCHE better?
On ETFValuer's overall model — which blends return, risk-adjusted performance, cost, drawdown, size and volatility — IEMG scores higher: 75.4 (Grade B+) versus 62.9 for SCHE. That doesn't make SCHE a bad fund; it means IEMG currently edges it out on this specific mix of factors. Read the metric-by-metric breakdown below before deciding which matters more for your own portfolio.
Which has the lower expense ratio, IEMG or SCHE?
SCHE currently has the lower expense ratio (0.06% vs. 0.09%).
Can I hold both IEMG and SCHE?
You can, though the benefit is limited. At a correlation of 0.96, IEMG and SCHE fall together far more often than not, so owning both adds complexity and a second expense ratio without much real diversification. Most investors are better served picking one.
Go deeper on either fund
Full daily-updated metrics, holdings context, and category peers.